Methodology white paper

How Forta scores AI workforce exposure.

Forta’s exposure scoring is deterministic and side-effect-free. Every number the audit produces is traceable to a published source. No AI models are used to generate predictions or recommendations — the engine applies weighted scoring functions to cited research data only.

The Forta audit is itself not a high-risk AI system under EU AI Act Annex III: it scores roles at the family level and never profiles individual workers. This is readiness, not compliance — nothing here is legal advice, and there is no current UK statutory requirement to conduct it.

Methodology white paperLast reviewed 24 June 2026 · Methodology v1.3

The indices it draws on

Exposure scores are calibrated against three published research bases, cross-checked against current UK labour-market data:

  • IMF — Cazzaniga et al. (2024)Establishes that roughly 60% of jobs in advanced economies are exposed to AI in some form, and distinguishes exposure that substitutes labour from exposure that augments it. Forta uses this as the macro baseline.
  • Felten / Raj / Seamans — AIOE index (2021)The AI Occupational Exposure index maps occupations to the AI capabilities most likely to affect them. Forta uses it to differentiate high-substitution from augmentation role families.
  • Frey & Osborne (2017)The original computerisation-probability study. Used as a cross-check on the rules-based, document-intensive families where the AIOE and Frey/Osborne signals converge.
  • UK labour-market dataONS Workforce Jobs, the Bank of England / FCA AI in UK Financial Services Survey 2024, CIPD, DfE, REC/APSCo and Lightcast ground the scores and pathways in current UK reality rather than projection alone.

The scoring logic, end to end

ExposureEvery role is mapped to one of fourteen role families and scored at family level against published AI-exposure indices, then headcount-weighted to a single workforce figure. The engine is deterministic and side-effect-free — the same input always yields the same output.
ConfidencePre-validation scores carry a Medium confidence band; the Validate phase narrows it against the client’s real task data. Higher declared task data tightens the band. Scores are presented as ranges, never false-precision point claims.
CostReplacement cost is modelled at 0.45–0.90× salary (mid 0.60×); transition is modelled with a 70% conversion assumption and 25% overhead. All figures are indicative ranges for planning, not guarantees.
RedeploymentDestinations are scored on skills adjacency to UK shortage sectors. Each pathway is a hypothesis for the Validate phase — confirmed against real, anonymous worker profiles before any decision is taken.
LimitationsFunding eligibility, redeployment fit and exposure ratings all require validation with the client. Nothing here is legal advice. The audit is readiness, not compliance.

The fourteen role families

Every workforce maps onto these families. Exposure is the family score against the indices above; the horizon is the window over which substitution pressure typically materialises.

Role familyTypeHorizonExposure
Clerical & Administrativehigh substitution1-3 years84
Customer Operationshigh substitution1-3 years78
Finance & Back Officehigh substitution1-4 years72
Paralegal & Legal Supportmedium substitution2-4 years71
Inside Sales & Telemarketingmedium substitution2-4 years68
Junior Analysts (Generalist)augmentation2-5 years64
HR Operationsmedium substitution2-5 years58
Creative & Designaugmentation2-5 years52
Logistics & Operationsmedium substitution3-7 years48
Middle Managementaugmentation3-7 years42
Senior Professional / Knowledge Workeraugmentation3-7 years38
Technical & Skilled Tradesaugmentation5-10 years28
Frontline Service (Care, Hospitality)low impact5-10 years22
Executive & Senior Leadershipaugmentation5-10 years18

Destination pathways

Redeployment destinations are scored on current UK demand and time-to-competence. Pathways on the UK Shortage Occupation List are flagged — these carry the most durable demand.

PathwayMedian salaryTime to competentDemand
Care Sector Coordinator (Senior Carer / Team Lead)Shortage£28,00010 weeks95
Cyber Governance, Risk & Compliance AnalystShortage£45,00016 weeks92
Data AnalystShortage£42,00018 weeks90
Financial Crime / AML AnalystShortage£42,00014 weeks88
Regulatory Compliance Analyst£44,00014 weeks85
Business Analyst£45,00016 weeks84
Data Protection Officer (Junior)Shortage£48,00018 weeks82
Technical Support Engineer£36,00016 weeks80
Product Analyst£50,00018 weeks78
Transformation Lead / Change Manager£65,00020 weeks78
Customer Success Manager£44,00012 weeks76
Sales Engineering / Solutions£55,00020 weeks74
Junior Product Manager£58,00026 weeks72
Workforce Planning Analyst£42,00014 weeks70
People Operations Specialist£38,00012 weeks68

Sources

·IMF Cazzaniga et al. (2024) — Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work
·Felten, Raj & Seamans (2021) — AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) index
·Frey & Osborne (2017) — The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
·ONS Workforce Jobs (JOBS02) — financial and insurance activities -3.6% Sep 2024 to Sep 2025
·Bank of England / FCA AI in UK Financial Services Survey 2024
·CIPD Labour Market Outlook — 1-in-6 employers expecting shrinkage Q4 2025
·DfE Unit for Future Skills — UK Shortage Occupation Index
·REC & APSCo Q4 2025 UK Labour-Market Reports
·Lightcast Occupation Demand Index
·Treasury Select Committee AI in Financial Services (January 2026)
·Morgan Stanley — UK AI workforce net job loss data 2025
·EU Regulation 2024/1689 (EU AI Act) — cited for regulatory context only; governs AI that manages workers, not this audit